Reading Tendency (Concept vs. Narrative)

Enjoys texts that provoke deep thinking about life, purpose, and morality. This reader looks for underlying meaning rather than surface events, often questioning “what does this really say about us?” They prefer abstract reflection to plot-driven action.

Comprehension Style (Evidence vs. Possibility)

Connects ideas intuitively, weaving symbolic clues and philosophical undertones into personal insight. They infer rather than prove, comfortably holding multiple interpretations at once.

Topics Drawn To (Combination)

Drawn to allegories, reflective fiction, and philosophical novels such as The Alchemist, Life of Pi, or Brave New World. They also enjoy essays that challenge assumptions about ethics, identity, or freedom.

Comprehension Challenges (Evidence vs. Possibility)

Can lose precision when evidence is needed to support interpretation. Sometimes drifts into abstraction, missing concrete textual proof. Emotional distance or over-intellectualizing may obscure the author’s human intent.

How to Approach Books (Text vs. Multi-sensory)

Benefit from text-based reflection: highlight thematic lines, craft one-sentence “truths” per chapter, and journal connections between idea and self. Debate or Socratic discussion reinforces clarity without constraining imagination.