Seeks structured understanding of how systems operate, but prefers learning through visual or contextual materials rather than dense text. Rather than simply following a story, this reader dissects how and why things happen in the real world—often imagining themselves inside the process.

Thinks in cause-and-effect chains and prefers concrete data to speculation. However, their multi-sensory lean makes them naturally drawn to infographics, photographs, or first-hand accounts that bring abstract evidence to life. They verify facts by “seeing” or “hearing” how evidence fits the larger pattern.

Gravitates toward investigative nonfiction, science and history told through documentary or journalistic lenses, biographies with visuals, or texts that blend data with story—space missions, civil rights movements, environmental research, technological innovation. They like knowledge that explains real-world impact.

While strong at identifying factual links, they may struggle with abstraction when information is purely textual or theoretical. Dense argumentation without examples or imagery can feel detached and hard to retain. They can also miss the author’s deeper intention if the presentation lacks sensory context.

Enhance comprehension with multi-modal reinforcement—pair reading with charts, timelines, videos, or podcasts. Encourage visual note-taking (diagrams, data maps) and reflective summaries linking what they see to what they conclude. Gradually introduce text-heavy essays to build endurance while maintaining engagement through sensory scaffolds.