Seeks ideas that explain societies and systems. Prefers stories that propose alternate realities or future possibilities, not for escapism but for what they reveal about human structure and choice.

Infers purpose through logic and analogy—reading to test hypotheses about how ideas might work in the real world. Connects patterns across characters, timelines, or systems to forecast outcomes.

Engaged by speculative or dystopian fiction (1984, Scythe), social philosophy, and science-based thought experiments. They appreciate organized arguments exploring innovation, justice, or ethics.

Sometimes resists emotional or ambiguous storytelling, demanding rational closure. Can miss symbolic or relational nuance when focusing on theoretical consistency.

Works best through textual frameworks—timelines, argument charts, and theme webs. To stretch imagination, pair each analytical note with one “what if?” reflection that links the concept to contemporary reality.