1
Reading Tendency (Concept vs. Narrative)
Prefers books that present clear ideas, arguments, and structured reasoning over purely story-driven plots. Rather than being immersed in characters or emotions, this reader seeks to understand how the world works—identifying systems, causes, and big concepts embedded within factual or historical texts.
2
Comprehension Style (Evidence vs. Possibility)
Processes information through verification and logical sequencing. They focus on details—dates, sources, and cause-effect patterns—to construct a defensible conclusion. Their comprehension solidifies through connecting data points, textual proof, and author claims rather than speculation or open-ended inference.
3
Topics Drawn To (Combination)
Gravitates toward nonfiction, biographies, investigative journalism, and historically or scientifically grounded works. They enjoy real-world stories that expose human systems—law, justice, innovation, or social change—supported by evidence and reasoning. Books with explicit structure (chronology, claim–proof–result) are most engaging.
4
Comprehension Challenges (Evidence vs. Possibility)
May struggle when texts demand interpretive leaps—such as abstract symbolism, emotional subtext, or moral ambiguity. When confronted with imaginative or nonlinear storytelling, they can lose interest or misread the author’s underlying intent. Strength in precision sometimes limits empathy for ambiguity or conceptual metaphor.
5
How to Approach Books (Text vs. Multi-sensory)
Best engages through text-anchored study methods: annotation, marginal notes, argument maps, and quote-evidence logs. Summarizing claims and tracing reasoning chains enhances comprehension. For stretch growth, occasionally use audiobooks or visual materials that humanize facts—biographies, documentaries, or graphic nonfiction—to connect data with lived experience.
















